Will Bolivia Be Ruined, Improved, or Hated Because of Electric Cars?
With growing speculation that electric cars and other energy efficient vehicles will soon dominate markets worldwide, Bolivia is a nation that perhaps stands to benefit (or suffer) more than any other from the energy revolution.
Most electric cars will be powered by lithium batteries, and Bolivia has more lithium than any other nation worldwide. How this development will affect Bolivia is unknown, but will squarely place the South American country at an intriguing and crucial crossroads.
Bolivia: a Microcosm of World’s Struggles and Possibilities
Even though Bolivia might have incredible economic growth thanks to future sales of lithium, it does not change the fact that Bolivia currently struggles in almost every possible way.
The government is unstable, in part because of a fight over one of Bolivia’s other abundant natural resources: natural gas. I have written before about how President Evo Morales’ government plans to redistribute land, a controversial move that many of the country’s wealthier citizens think amounts to theft, despite claims that some wealthy ranchers have enslaved tribal people. On the other hand, regardless of what you think of modern socialism, or of Evo Morales and his followers, I think it is reasonable to say that with two thirds or more of the country living in poverty, the idea to redistribute land is not without its supporters.
- You Might Also Digg (CleanTechnica): New X PRIZE Challenge: Build an Ultracapacitor
- Or (Gas 2.0): Sierra Nevada Beer Brews Ethanol, Says Wazzup?
- Also, Get EcoWorldy by RSS or sign up by email.
When a developing country is as poor as Bolivia, a central question we have to ask ourselves is how might it be possible for quality of life to be improved for its people? To the best of my knowledge, the primary model of economic development for thousands of years has been to sell and transform what is naturally available from the earth. How often is it that many people benefit from the extraction and sale of natural resources rather than a few? Is there an alternative economic model? If total natural resource extraction, rather than resource conservation is the model we follow, where will this lead us in years to come from an environmental standpoint? Will there be any nature left to exploit? These are important questions to keep in our minds as we examine the case of Bolivia and lithium closer. It also helps us to better consider the dramatic political climate in Bolivia, as manifested currently in a form of socialism.
Evo Morales has already nationalized the oil and gas industries of Bolivia, in theory making the profits benefit all Bolivians equally. Perhaps he has wants to change the idea that Bolivia is “a donkey sitting on a gold mine of natural resources,” because he is also a fan of the idea to make Bolivia a major exporter of lithium. In fact, according to an article published recently on www.hybridcars.com he would like Bolivia to be the world’s leading producer of lithium. But the article also reports that Morales has rejected offers from at least 4 auto companies to buy from Bolivia, including Toyota and Mitsubishi, saying that they simply want to take the lithium away for little compensation.
Instead he would like Bolivia to become wealthy from its lithium, much like Venezuela and Saudi Arabia with their oil– on Bolivia’s own terms. I like this idea in principle. To date, many of the world’s natural resources have been exploited by developed nations and corporations, leaving other countries impoverished and often polluted despite their ownership of these resources (see this case in Ecuador, for instance). So I guess if Morales’ idea to make lithium of value to the entire people of his country is put into practice, it would be hard for lithium to be a negative force in the country (excepting that lithium can be toxic and probably through extraction could have other negative environmental consequences– more on this topic later).
But despite good intentions, I’m not entirely sure that countries who become powerbrokers of resources tend to have success spreading the wealth. Do the majority of a country’s citizens really benefit in countries like Venezuela and Saudi Arabia where oil is abundant? I tend to think no personally, although I’m not aware of all the examples that might be available, and I still read conflicting reports about what’s happening in Venezuela.
Even if we think optimistically that sales of lithium will help improve the lives of Bolivians, it is not an endless resource, and this could be a problem.
Improved.
Look no further than the cash reserve increases Bolivia has since Morales took over.
Bolivia has put their foot down and drawn the line. They are more than willing to do deals, however, they are no longer willing to be taken lightly. Previous Bolivian governments has raided the country coffers.
As far as the govt being unstable. Well, be definition this can be disputed. But, what can not be disputed is that small developing nations with rich natural resources are waking up and starting to capitalize.
Don’t wait too much Bolivia. One thing is that it took 100 years to change from Petroleum to Electricity. But you can be sure that in less than 5 years, alternatives to Lithium will be available for batteries and ultracapacitators. You only have to see the index of evolution of the Rechargable Batteries in the last 10 years (when only the “walkman” needed recharegable batteries) ;-D
Now “all” uses batteries: laptops, MP3, DECT Phones, Mobile Phones, Teethbrushers!!!! and now CARS!
As high the price of Lithium maintains, as soon new batteries with new materials will be developed for cheap.
So Bolivia, get the money for the people, but start to mine Lithium now before its price drop.
Levy should read the Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein, who spent a lot of time researching the events and players that gave rise to what is happening in South America today. He’ll get a better understanding of the past 40 year history of the region and hopefully see things more clearly. So many people go on about “Morales thinks this”, “Chavez believes that”, all getting their news from the NY Times and other sausage factories. Try a book once in a while.
Dear quasimojo,
Thanks for the suggestion to read Shock Doctrine. I’ve googled it and will definitely try to read it as I think its thesis is interesting in regard to the reasons why free-market forces and policies have been adopted in so many countries.
As someone who lives in Peru, I actually get a lot of my news from South American sources, and I also happen to think that the NY Times is a pretty good periodical. But I recognize that there are many sides to a story and that my knowledge can also grow, and that my opinions can always change.
Since your skill as a reader seems quite adept, might I politely suggest that you check how you spelled my name and check where some of the links in the article will lead you.
Thanks for your comment.
Levi
[...] Fuente: EcoWordly [...]
EV resource naysayers need to tone it down. There’s enough: lithium, electricity, plug-ins, etc.. The problem is getting auto/oil interests out of the way so EVs can be made on a commercial, economical scale.
If EV resources are actually a problem with an EV mass market years from now - the market will adjust with different, better, newer technologies at that time.
Hmm, I think you might just be onto something here. Well done.
RT
http://www.anonymity-tools.us.tc
I have studied environmental issues for a couple years and i always get the same feeling; either people don’t understand the science of global warming or there care for other environmental factors blind them. Ok so a few people in Bolivia will suffer heath problems but what about future generations of children that wont have an earth that functions poorly.
Morales is just doing what countless dictators have done before him. He is raping the country blind. While he fiddles, those who have actually provided jobs are bailing out of the country, with the actual capital to make Bolivia a strong country.