Barack Obama to Designate Waterfall as New National Park
Next week Barack Obama is expected to sign legislation that will create a national park from 35 acres of historical sites that surround a 77 foot high waterfall in New Jersey. It will be the first national park Obama will designate during his presidency.
The tall waterfall is known as the “Great Falls,” and has been featured in a philosophical poem by William Carlos Williams, and even as a nice spot for a murder in a Sopranos episode. Williams’s poem focuses upon Sam Hatch, who jumped over the falls, and later gained notoriety for becoming the first known person to survive a ride over New York’s Niagara Falls.
- » See also: Has Tanzania Broken Ranks With EAC Over Elephant Ivory Trade?
- » Get EcoWorldly by RSS or sign up by email.
Beyond its intrinsic beauty, the waterfall and the surrounding community of Paterson, New Jersey are rich in history, lending the area greater credentials for obtaining coveted national park status. The Great Falls area of New Jersey is considered to have been one of the key starting locations for America’s Industrial Revolution, when machines began to be used on a large scale to manufacture goods in factories. The Falls themselves were used for water power, even to produce the first Colt .45 revolvers.
But while some people will cheer the new park which will be created as part of a huge public lands legislation package, others are frowning down upon the development.
Creating a New National Park Never Without Controversy
While designating a new national park looks great on a President’s resume, the decision to make a new national park is almost always accompanied by criticism. The essential issues involve 1) whether or not an area is truly significant nationally (i.e. to all Americans and their history), and 2) whether or not the money used to create and maintain a new national park would be better spent elsewhere.
A related issue is that for most communities who live near to national parks, the uptick in tourism is terrific for the local economy. That’s exactly what some residents of Paterson, New Jersey are hoping the new national park will mean for them. Faraway in the country of Scotland, one group of communities has even begun to ponder if they should create a national park to help stop their population from shrinking due to a lack of jobs. Residents of the U.S.’s Florida Keys also have thrown around an idea to get the Keys designated as a national park, not so much for tourism (but could it really hurt?), but because they claim they don’t have the funds to properly protect important beach habitats.
But can economic and local desires cloud the rationale for making certain areas national parks, and also subsequently diminish the national park brand? There are some people who certainly believe so– and the Bush Administration was among them. According to the Associated Press, “the bill [for the new park] comes two years after the National Park Service, under the Bush administration, declined to recommend protected status for the Great Falls.” The Washington Times notes that “a 2006 National Park Service study said the site is neither suitable nor feasible, the park system already includes enough waterfalls and similar cultural sites, and Paterson is already well-protected by the state. The study noted that Niagara Falls has never been designated a national park because it is protected by New York.”
So what do you think? Is the new national park a good idea and great news for New Jersey? Or is it a waste of tax dollars that could be used elsewhere?
Photo Credit: Tony the Misfit on Flickr under a Creative Commons license
it’s Sam ‘Patch’, not ‘Hatch’
Awesome News. Growing up in NJ, this was a famous and historic place to visit. So astounding to see and hear the falls in the middle of urban NJ. Today I appreciate the geology a whole lot more than I did then. Thanks for sharing this.
I was just at the falls this weekend. Its such an unusual place, because Paterson is a rugged place, and somehow in the middle is this beautiful waterfall, that is just as rugged. I love this area and come from time to time. I love that it could be a tourist trap; but it isn’t. It has such a critical place in American history–Alexander Hamilton traveled to the falls, and determined the potential of the falls and the power it could generate. Subsequently, factories and an economy was brought to the area. Although Paterson is no longer a factory town, it remains a very fascinating place for culture and to view the falls. I enjoy the experience every time, like its a hidden secret in Jersey. We natives know there are many hidden places, just like the Falls, that aren’t exploited like in other states. Maybe we should highlight these area more, or maybe they should remain hidden?
It’s ironic that the Bush NPS used Niagara Falls’ lack of national park status as justification for not bringing Great Falls into the park system. The degradation of Niagara Falls from excessive commercialization after the Civil War, which continues to this day, is what started the national park movement in the first place, leading to the founding of Yosemite, then Yellowstone, to protect them before they shared Niagara’s fate.